I've run into issues with the belief that the video in my previous post on psychology is a 'fraud' and 'toxic positivity,' so maybe in the future I will only say what needs to be said in my own words to reduce what I call "toxic distortivity." Toxic distortivity can be defined as:
"Going to extremes to distort and/or falsely label what's being said."
In my own words, here's some psychology that may be useful:
Beyond positive thinking (which is toxic positivity) and beyond the emotions, there is the story that people tell themselves based on their past. When analyzing myself, I found that I have destructive stories I've been telling myself for a long time that do indeed cause destructive life tendencies. It actually is the stories I've been telling myself (when I'm alone with no external disturbances) that underlie my destructive thinking and feeling.
The dark forces promote that truthers have a know-it-all attitude that is closed off to exploring certain subject matter. The dark forces want truthers to not venture to explore the hard sciences, for example, and instead blow off the hard sciences as 'cabal disinformation.' Yet, if truthers actually got into the hard sciences, they could come up with breakthroughs that 'normies' would not have come up with (hopefully not getting assassinated in the process of course). This is because truthers have a more powerful imagination than average people that can reach new heights when this is applied to the hard sciences.
Psychology is also a science, although not 'hard.' In addition to promoting that the hard sciences be avoided, the dark forces also use various psychological methods to get truthers to blow off the benefits of psychology as being 'cabal nonsense' or a 'fraud' or 'toxic positivity' in order to keep them in a limited lane of thought.
Here's a question: If all the sciences are 'cabal-run junk' and so forth, why do we have cars and jets and advanced computers and so forth? It's obvious that the hard sciences have countless tangible manifestations. It's just that there are of course limitations and directions the hard sciences do not venture.
There definitely is a closed-mindedness to the hard sciences, but blowing off the hard sciences (and psychology) is actually even more closed-minded than the hard sciences are. How ironic that many truthers who see themselves as having so much 'out-of-the-box thinking' are actually more closed-minded than mainstream scientists!
A truly awakened and powerful individual embraces the hard sciences and psychology and is open to metaphysics and alternative information at the same time. Also, any distortions in the hard sciences and psychology, along with distortions from alternative information, get sifted through with discernment. (Questioning of authority is still 100% enacted.)
With that being said, back to accusations of 'toxic positivity' against my previous post:
All I'm saying is that there can be a balance between toxic negativity (and toxic distortivity) and toxic positivity, which also has its own version of toxic distortivity (a modified definition of toxic distortivity within toxic positivity).
It's definitely not beneficial to be 'sunshine and rainbows' all the time. Yet, it's also definitely not beneficial to be 'doom and gloom' all the time either. There can actually be a middle ground between the two. Surely there is a 'sweet spot.' That is my aim.
It's understood that many need direct intervention from the light forces ASAP. Yet, day after day, week after week, year after year, and decade after decade (some have been into being extracted since the "Age of Aquarius" music video came out in the late 1960's) goes by without interventions that can be directly experienced, so it may be even worse to wait on the light forces in a great state of need without exploring other avenues. I for one will not wait on intervention while my life wastes away. Pardon my 'french,' but that way of 'living' can go fuck itself. ⚡️🔥
Update on 04/13:
I felt it necessary to scrutinize the video in the previous post using AI. I asked AI to come up with a better, more complete version of the video that removes inaccuracies. I also requested that this be stated in a way that is easily relatable. Here goes:
"A more accurate way to understand “core stories” is not as a single hidden force that controls your life, but as part of a larger system made up of your thoughts, emotions, behaviors, and experiences, all constantly influencing each other. What people call a “core story” is basically a deep belief or pattern you’ve learned over time about yourself, other people, or how the world works (for example, “I’m not good enough” or “people will hurt me”). These beliefs don’t just come from one moment in childhood. They usually form from repeated experiences, especially emotional ones, and they stick around because your mind keeps finding ways to confirm them, often without you realizing it.
These “stories” feel true not because they’re always accurate, but because they’re reinforced in multiple ways. For example, if you believe you’ll be rejected, you might avoid social situations or act guarded, which prevents you from having positive experiences that could prove the belief wrong. Your mind also tends to focus on evidence that supports what you already believe and ignore what doesn’t. On top of that, emotions play a role. If something feels scary or uncomfortable, it can make the belief seem even more valid. So the story keeps itself going, not just as an idea, but as a loop between thinking, feeling, and acting.
Because of this, real change doesn’t come from simply “telling yourself a new story.” It usually requires a more structured process. That includes questioning your beliefs, looking at actual evidence, and most importantly, testing them in real life by doing things you might normally avoid. Over time, these new experiences can start to weaken the old patterns and support more accurate, flexible ways of thinking. Changing your “story” is part of the process, but it happens gradually, as your mind updates based on what you consistently experience, and not all at once through insight alone.
At the same time, it’s important to be realistic about responsibility. You’re not in control of everything that shaped you or everything that happens to you. But you do have some control over how you respond and what you choose to do next, within your circumstances. So a better way to look at it is this: your core beliefs matter, but they are not fixed and not all-powerful. They are part of a system that can change, but only through repeated, real-world adjustments, and not just by deciding to think differently about the stories you tell yourself."