Options and Possibilities
Regarding my previous post on meditation, there are people who don't have PTSD who still don't want to meditate at all, which is totally fine. Some have high energy and need physical and/or mental activities to 'get it out of their systems,' and even a short amount of meditation can cause them to be more high-strung. Definitely, meditation isn't for everyone, and 'no one size fits all.'
No one should feel alienated for being different. I myself have felt great alienation when I would research sensationalist health claims on youtube and other platforms. I often ended up thinking/feeling, "They say this works for just about everyone, but it harms me. No fair." That is not a fun place to be. The real individual in the real world does not adhere to most of the claims that are out there. Reality doesn't work that way, even though the internet constantly attempts to make it look like it does.
Regarding my advice to others, "advice" is too strong a word. I'm instead going to use the word "options." Also, "possibilities." My blog can say something like, "This is an option that may or may not work, depending on who it is," and "I found this as a possibility to explore." Some examples of possibilities are from science, the occult, and Et paradigms.
I still have my own stances, and it's virtually impossible to exclude this from my material. Yet, 'my take' on various matters is not 'the gospel truth.' And, there can be open debates in the comments.
Roger Kerr's Et Paradigm
Over a decade ago before I came across 2012 Portal, I read something very potent called "The Truth About the "Orion Lizards" by Roger Kerr:
https://thinkaboutit-aliens.com/truth-about-orion-lizards/
This material goes into "changelings," who are compared to Deep Space Nine's Odo and Dominion. They can take various forms on various planes, and when I really thought about them, it makes sense that they would be the most powerful manipulators in existence. Cobra's "chimera," the draco, and reptilians actually would never have been at the top of the food chain of the dark forces if Kerr's paradigm is true, or if a significant portion of it is true. This is because changelings can take the form of chimera, draco, and reptilians. Beings that can take the form of anything far outmatch the manipulative power of beings that cannot.
It took some digging to find Kerr's short book, and it's some of the most mind-blowing material I've ever come across. So many Et paradigms paint draco and reptilians as the villains, and I love how Kerr's paradigm 'rocks the boat' in some of the most unique ways I've seen. There may be reservations by those who decide to check Kerr's material out (I had some myself), such as forgiveness of hostile forces being laid on very thick, but the paradigm of changelings existing and manipulating everything is absolutely brilliant!
Kerr's material also stands out because he actually had a prediction that came true. Kerr stated:
"But don't expect any miracles to happen in December 2012, because nothing is going to happen, of that much I am sure." (Kerr wrote his short book stating this in 2001.)
(I've seen many beings in the dreamstate and visionstate that could morph their forms. For unknown reasons I did not take another look at Kerr's material and mention it sooner, and that strikes me as strange.)
My Contradictions and Attackers
My contradictions: 1. I said I would leave my blog but I came back. 2. I said I wouldn't discuss 2012 Portal anymore in my posts but I did. 3. I said I wouldn't discuss 2012 Portal anymore in the comments but I did.
My solution: I won't say I will or will not say or do (fill in the blank). This in itself is me saying I won't say or do something though, and there may or may not be rare exceptions. Or, I could say I may or may not say or do (fill in the blank). (This is making me laugh a bit now, but as far as I can tell, this is now covered.)
Why did I contradict myself? I wanted to 'start life over' and completely disengage. Yet, I later realized that the only way out was to go through it, step by step. It doesn't just 'go away' by trying to ignore it. The mind doesn't operate that way. It has to be hashed out fully so that the mind can have a definite conclusion – closure.
Some can AI my entire blog to see if they can find more contradictions if they want. I'm open to learning the flaws in my thinking and patterns of thought so that I can improve. However, if projecting, bullying, manipulation, and other related tactics are used when calling something out I've said, or if it's not calling out something I've said and is just an attack in general, such tactics can be exposed through 'dissection.' It's also possible to look through all the tactics and get down to the root of the actual substance of what an attacker is saying, turning it into a distortion-free message.
This is also relevant:
https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/fallacies
(Wow, there are 238 logical fallacies on that list!)
I may or may not dissect every attacker, as there are time constraints, and of course this sort of thing is bound to happen when there are many commenters; it just 'goes with the territory.' I'm pleased to say though that I'm getting faster and faster at doing this, with or without AI's assistance. Is this a waste of my time though? Not entirely. š Learning how to do this increases the knowledge and power of psychology – in particular, the psychology of how some people use manipulation. Heck, for those who still follow 2012 Portal, this can be seen as 'lurker dissection.'
Psychology is Key
One can ask oneself with any particular paradigm/following (Et or otherwise), "What's the psychology?" Readers here can do that for my blog too. I'm certainly not exempt.
Cobra mentions personal empowerment, but the locus of control has been very external with so much focus on Et interventions. And, when this gets changed to being more of an internal locus of control through a change in the narrative, of course this is going to be very upsetting to many. It goes something like, "We did all these meditations and so forth, and you said they'd do all these interventions that turned out to have no backing evidence, and now you're saying humans are the "biggest problem," which includes me. No fair."
Cobra is very strongly intertwined with participants. However, truly powerful and effective forces would not rely so heavily on participation from surface dwellers to liberate earth. The question can be asked, "What's the actual power of the Cobra's alleged light forces without mass meditations, stone plantings, and all other forms of participation from surface dwellers?" Sure, people can participate if they wish. It's the you-are-absolutely-critical-to-the-success-of-the-mission aspect that does not make sense, especially since the 'white hats,' who are supposed to have more leverage, have obviously consistently failed.
Of all the Et paradigms out there, Cobra's is by far the one that has emphasized/spotlighted Ets doing all these interventions over so many years. It's off the charts compared to any other Et paradigm I'm aware of. I then see many saying how they hate Ets and the light forces. Yet hypothetically, if Cobra had never been encountered by them, would this still be the case? Probably not. I don't see followers of other non-Cobra Et paradigms having this deep hatred. More on this here:
https://share.google/aimode/gOBiTqBq6xoH0N4sk
(I only used AI after writing what I wrote, for the purpose of further articulation. This qualifies as not having AI doing my thinking for me.)
And, the Event gets held in front of followers like a carrot on a stick. It keeps many stuck, believing that no matter how bad it gets, in the 'blink of an eye' it will all just magically become 'heaven on earth.' This can keep followers hooked regardless of the timeframe and level of damage.
One of the most striking realizations I've had is that facing reality (business as usual) is difficult but not impossible outside the lens of the Cobra paradigm. Facing reality through the lens of the Cobra paradigm, however, can be magnitudes worse.
The 'psychological cost' of leaving Cobra's paradigm is very high. Part of this was done through giving promises of the most profound heavenly experiences possible, which made life without this perceived as less than nothing. The promises/expectations from 2012 Portal were so out-of-this-world high that many followers could not pay the mental price of walking away and accepting and working with the world we actually live in.
Hence, I concluded that to make it in this dog-eat-dog world as perpetual business as usual, perhaps one can train oneself to bear the unbearable. I myself have had a very hard time doing this, but the more this is applied, the easier it gets. Even some degree of inspiration can return for learning the mysteries of how things work through the sciences. (Again, this is optional. I'm not forcing this on anyone. Just because I get excited about certain aspects does not mean everyone else should too. 'Do your thing.')
Minds and Science
The intuitive mind without the logical mind can be gullible and even cult-like in behavior. The logical mind without the intuitive mind can be rigid/closed minded. Having both minds well developed and working together in unison is of course ideal.
Intuition can be open to the metaphysical/fringe while logic can come up with a filtering system so that not every metaphysical/fringe claim that's out there is instantly believed. For example, it can easily be argued that cloudships have entirely mundane explanations. They are what's known as "lenticular clouds" or "altocumulus formations." They form when stable, moist air flows over mountains or other large terrain, creating standing gravity waves in the atmosphere. (A "standing gravity wave" is a pattern of rising and sinking air that stays roughly in the same place when stable air flows over mountains, like ripples fixed in place while water moves through them.) As the air rises within a wave, it cools and moisture condenses into a cloud. As it descends, the cloud evaporates. Because the wave can remain stationary while air continuously moves through it, the resulting cloud can maintain a remarkably smooth, sharply defined disk or saucer-like shape. Under the right conditions, multiple layers can form, producing stacked or elongated structures that look surprisingly artificial. The phenomenon is entirely natural and predates the modern UFO era by centuries from observation, and they've existed for millions of years before that. More on this here:
Some can say that they felt Et energies from these clouds, but what if a group of people have energies they are giving off that does this through collective belief? What if people believing in something in unison is what causes such energetic experiences? When the logical mind starts working with the intuitive mind (and vice-versa), beliefs can be challenged that were not challenged before, which can help to get closer to reality.
Another example is precognition. If someone has a precognitive dream, the way to prove this to oneself is through something manifesting in the near future that confirms the dream. Several years ago, I had a dream of dinosaurs on a screen. I thought, "What the heck?" The next day, I asked a family member what he wanted to do for his birthday. He said he wanted to go see Jurassic World, and that's what we did. The most reliable metaphysical experiences are ones that have physical counterparts.
Yet, even with physical manifestations, there are instances when claims can be kept in check. For example, are sightings of UFOs actual evidence that these UFOs are the light forces? ("UFO" is what I want to use. At least to me, "UAP" is just an OCD-inspired acronym.) There are so many other Et paradigms that have entirely different claims about the nature and intent of UFOs. The evidence that UFOs are the light forces would be these UFOs doing Event-level interventions instead of continually protracting. Because directly experienced promised results continue to not happen when all of Cobra's requirements for Event-level interventions were met several months ago (despite his attempted pivot in the narrative to hyper-inflate the lurker), the conclusion can be, "Based on the evidence, I cannot conclude that the light forces exist. Positive Ets exist, but maybe not under Cobra's paradigm."
(Tangent: A major thesis could be developed arguing that the reason there's so much suffering and abuse on earth is because humanity doesn't know how things work well enough. (I'm using "how things work" for convenience.) If humanity reached a certain level of knowing how things work, the dark forces could be defeated without Et assistance because part of knowing how things work is knowing how the dark forces work (and of course taking action based on this). How things work is versatile though. It would have to be knowing how things work with science, psychology, metaphysics, and ethics. And, humanity would have to have a very deep level of cooperation. ("Ethics" would be "How do we use how things work for net constructive purposes instead of net destructive purposes?")
Still, a Worthy Mention
An awesome commenter has been mentioning meditations from an interesting angle:
This blog is open to Cobra followers, Cobra dissenters, those who don't care about Ets, those who do, scientists, truthers, meditators, non-meditators, everyday people, and so on. I do have my own stances and agreements and disagreements with others, but that doesn't mean I'm always right, and if something comes along that disproves what I'm saying, I'll change my stance. For example, if there actually are Event-level interventions, I'll definitely say I was wrong. I would love to be proven wrong there. Yet, inescapably, the whole of reality continues to do something else.
