Rescue the Children!

I saw a school bus today dropping kids off and they were all wearing the blue asbestos masks.  That's child abuse.  If people want to get vaccinated and wear masks, that's their choice, but children can't make the choice whether or not to consent.  This woman is very courageous, speaking out against the schools: 

This is Courtney Ann Taylor, a mother in Georgia. She’s one of the many parents who’ve HAD IT with mask mandates, especially for young kids in school.

Most adults are obviously going along with child abuse though because the rules are staying the same.  Even though most adults have lost what's left of their sanity, children still have a chance.  Children are the future of humanity.  When children are forced to wear masks all day in school, they are not only physically harmed, but are also psychologically harmed, being taught that it's morally right to accept abusive, totalitarian rules for a nonexistent "greater good."  A really good way to destroy any given country is to first brainwash and enslave the adults, and then the brainwashed and enslaved adults brainwash and enslave the future of the country - the children.  

Most adults couldn't effectively deal with Covid and Covid tyranny, so they took things out on their children.  Domestic abuse against children skyrocketed during lockdowns, and now parents are continuing to abuse their children by forcing them to wear masks, and will probably force them to get Covid shots in the future as well.  Maybe there should come a day in the very near future when all the children in the world vanish, taken to a non-abusive location elsewhere in the galaxy by positive Ets.  If most parents are going to abuse their children, they deserve to wake up one morning to find that their children are GONE.  

Deep underground bases were extremely abusive to children, but the adult surface population at large is also abusive.  Abusive parents don't deserve to keep their children!  

The Anomaly Harbored Within

I've noticed that energy has a way of manifesting through people.  When there is aggressive energy that I have within myself, but I don't act out this aggressive energy and remain physically calm, the aggressive energy finds a way to manifest through someone else.  The aggressive energy finds someone else who has less self-control in the moment.  Someone else will get into a conflict, allowing the aggressive energy to play itself out.  

Anything that goes on within a person, if it has enough emotional strength, but is not acted out, possibly manifests elsewhere in reality.  This might be true individually and collectively.  There are probably many people who have hidden, dark, taboo desires and urges.  These kinds of desires and urges are not acted out though, because these kinds of desires and urges are immoral.  Yet, maybe these kinds of desires and urges have to run through to their completion, so they find a way manifest elsewhere through someone else who is more inclined to ignore morality.  

Perhaps there are also people who are good-natured and unsuspecting, and out of nowhere, they are possessed to commit atrocities.  This reminds me of an episode from Star Trek Voyager, called "Random Thoughts."  I very highly recommend watching this episode.  In this episode, there is a telepathic society that prosecutes what is known as 'thought crime,' where it is illegal to have violent or destructive thoughts because these violent or destructive thoughts manifest as physically violent behavior through unsuspecting victims.

(Sidenote:  There is also the emotion of fear to consider.  Fear is often used to intimidate populations to go along with totalitarian measures.  Often times the fear will be of something that is not that much of a threat but is greatly overblown.  This fear perhaps then spreads like a virus, growing exponentially within populations.  Or, another country is deemed as a threat, and people collectively believe this to be true, enabling unnecessary wars.  The real unseen threat causing the real problems can then infiltrate and destroy the country that's being manipulated to fight the false enemy.)

Of course, no one can be the 'thought police.'  People are free to think about, feel about, and fantasize about anything they wish.  Yet, should there be some sort of responsibility for those who harbor darkness within?  The argument could be made that "Even if I had the dark thoughts and fantasies, I didn't act them out.  This person did!  It was their fault for being so weak to not have any self-control!"  

Those who have really negative thinking do contribute to a toxic environment in a general sense, but in order for the negative thinking to really cause damage for manifestation of abuse elsewhere, someone probably has to physically hurt someone else.  For example, the cabal would need a physical sacrifice in order to bombard another specific location with severe enough negative energies to cause people to start acting out and hurting one another.  Without physically and/or sexually abusing and/or sacrificing someone else, the negative vibes are not potent enough to cause other people to become abusive.  Verbal arguments may manifest elsewhere when someone has inner hostility that isn't acted out, as was mentioned at the beginning of this article, but that's as far as the manifestation goes.  Basically, those who have abusive thinking but do not engage in real abuse provide a more energetically conducive environment for the cabal to operate, but are not the original cause. 

At the very least though, self-work involving healing inner wounds would greatly help the planetary situation, because when someone heals their inner wounds, inner darkness is no longer harbored and entertained, giving the cabal nothing to work with.  If people didn't have so many dark thoughts, desires, and inner hostility, there would be less manifestation of conflict and abuse because the cabal would no longer have an environment allowing them to commit atrocities, as the light would shine too brightly for the cabal to go unnoticed.  This is perhaps what planetary cleansing really entails.  Perhaps the removal of implants mentioned by Cobra will be the final removal of the anomaly - the anomaly harbored within, resulting in checkmate for the cabal.

Debugging Creation

The reason Evil exists is because creation somehow became disconnected from God. The question then arises: Why would God make a creation where the creation can be disconnected from God?

To explain this, the conclusion is that God is not all knowing and not all powerful and not all present. God is therefore also not infinite. Yet, these are the aspects that make God into God. Therefore, God cannot exist. Yet, God exists. Therefore, God is Evil. Yet, God is not Evil. God is only Good.  The typical belief in God doesn't work!

De-personification of God greatly helps.  Creation then becomes a process instead of a divine plan.  When creation is a process, there can be errors.  The divine plan can still exist though if people still prefer to think this way, but the divine plan is modified into this:

Abuse has no place within creation; therefore, it is the divine plan to remove the mistake of having abuse exist within creation.  

It cannot be a divine plan for abuse to exist.  Stating that abuse is part of a divine plan means that abuse itself is divine.  Stating that abuse is part of a divine plan also means that evolution through abuse is necessary, which is not true.  

Creation can be looked at as a computer program.  Computer programs have errors that need to be debugged before completion.  The debugging is as follows:

- In all locations, remove abuse that is currently taking place.

- Heal all shadows that exist from previous abuse.

- Modify creation to never allow abuse to happen again in the future.

Strangely enough, ice cream can be used as an analogy for creation.  There are many different kinds of ice cream, all of which have unique flavors which are enjoyable to greater and lesser degrees depending on preference.  There could even potentially be an infinite number of different enjoyable flavors of ice cream.  However, what if someone were to put feces in ice cream?  The error within creation is analogous to having ice cream containing feces.

A debugged existence is an existence with an infinite number of enjoyable and interesting kinds of ice creams, minus the feces.  As another example, there is no ice cream with radioactive waste.  Choice still exists, but the choice for evil is no longer present because evil is rendered impossible.  Basically, existence is no longer able to be 'messed up.'  

The original reason for existence being able to be messed up was to heal and come back after being messed up in order to grow faster and stronger.  In a reasonable manner, this is acceptable.  For example, weight lifting is uncomfortable but causes the muscles to become stronger.  Weight lifting is within acceptable bounds, just as it is within acceptable bounds to have a flavor of ice cream that is less preferred.  However, this less preferred flavor of ice cream doesn't contain feces and radioactive waste and so forth, just as weight lifting doesn't contain rape, pedophilia, diabolical slavery, and gruesome torture.  

An Apology

In the past I've resorted to aggressive behavior against David Wilcock, Cobra, and others online.  The catalyst was that I would encounter inconsistencies, but under no circumstances is it acceptable to be aggressive with the ones giving the intel.  Inconsistencies can be pointed out in a non-aggressive way.  There are instances of sources of intel being infiltrated to key people.  Earth is probably the most difficult planet to be liberated of all time, so intel can be unknowingly infiltrated, and/or plans change because of unforeseen actions from the negative forces.  It happens.  I haven't walked in the shoes of others who are giving the intel they have been given.  I don't know what it's like to go through what they go through.     

I remember now that we all share one thing in common:  We've all seen abuse and been abused ourselves, and we all want abuse to end.  We're all on the same side.  Therefore, I offer my sincere apology, and I will continually monitor myself to see if I am being aggressive towards others with comments and messages.  In real life, I'm nice to people, so I should be this way with others online as well.  I do believe Cobra said to embody the Goddess within daily living, and online interaction is a part of daily living.
 
When hearing so much bad news about the vaccine killing much larger numbers of people than previously thought, according to this source mentioned on prepareforchange,

https://www.sott.net/article/449820-Objective-Health-Holocaust-2-0-Vaccine-Deaths-on-the-Rise-in-Multiple-Countries

and with vaccine passports being implemented physically in Israel and being passed in other countries,

https://prepareforchange.net/2021/04/12/the-covid19-vaccine-the-new-sacred-cow-dave-cullen/
 
it becomes very difficult to not become upset.  The direction Earth is going does not fit the profile of a planet being liberated from darkness.  It's a very difficult war with a very high number of casualties.  I will do the best I can to clear what needs to be cleared though, and leave it there.  That's all anyone can really do.  Aggression can be channeled to clear what needs to be cleared instead of creating conflict amongst those who want the same result, which is planetary liberation. 

How to Not be a Pawn on the Board?

Many people who rebel against the government don't realize they are on a chessboard.  I will use Michigan in the US as an example:

In Michigan, the governor was being a tyrant and imposing too many restrictions on the people.  The people then rebelled in mass against this.  Then, the cases per day went from around 1,500 to as high as over 9,000 on the 7th of April. Then, the media went all over this.  The media's message was basically:  "You see?  This is what happens when people are allowed to make their own decisions.  People need the government to tell them what to do in order to stay safe.  People obviously can't handle matters themselves."  (Whether the case numbers are made up is of course another story, but the numbers are being used by a very substantial number of people, which is enough for the cabal to do their damage.)

What I'm seeing from Michigan is maybe in certain instances the cabal want people to fight for their freedoms so that further justification can be used to take away their freedoms.  In certain instances the cabal want people to rebel in order to make the rebels and their cause look bad because of negative net results, which ends up making the ultra-conformists look good. 

But what's the answer?  Be an ultra-conformist and wear double masks, gouge your hands in hand sanitizer 50 or more times a day, and stay at home as much as possible?  No thank you lol! When playing chess, the solution isn't always so obvious.  It's not always a good idea to make bold moves and go after the big pieces on the chessboard.  Example: Player 1: "Look, I got your rook!" Player 2: "Yeah but now I take your queen and your king is now in check, sucker!"

My own way of dealing with the 'covid package' is to not take a strong stance so I can't be put in a box.  Regarding masks, I'm both a conformist and a nonconformist at the same time.  How?  I wear a face shield.  With a face shield, I'm not not being a 'sheeple' because I'm not wearing a mask, but I'm also not being an 'anti-sheeple' because I'm wearing a 'face covering.'  Being on neither side perhaps allows me to 'slip between the cabal's fingers.'  This is also probably true of right vs. left.  It's possible to be on neither side, unable to be categorized.  Without being able to be categorized, I can't be used as a pawn in the game of 'divide and conquer.' 

It really just depends on the situation though.  There are situations where outright rebellion could be the answer.  Sometimes a bold move can be the best move, and sometimes not.  Chess is extremely circumstantial, depending on where the pieces are in relation to one another.