Posts

Featured Post

A Good That Has No Opposite

Most people get so tied up in their beliefs and opinions that they see their versions of reality as absolute truth.  But this cannot be so, because they all have different, and many times, contradictory beliefs and opinions about the same situations.   If we want to see reality through various lenses, we can, but when we get lost in the lenses themselves, we lose our power because the lenses are only composed of duality; we become enslaved to duality.   If someone fears looking at reality beyond lenses, they have become over-identified with lenses. Outside lenses, the natural harmony of reality can be experienced.  Or, is this a 'lens of harmony?'  Rather, it's the essence of Source.  Source (or The Absolute) is naturally positive, and positive is the + side of duality.  Yet, in order for something to be dual, it has to have an opposite on the duality spectrum.  Because Source is a positive that has no opposite, Source is a positive that...

Doing Some Research

This shows how E'Asha Ashayana's claim that the Flower of Life is the "Daisy of Death" is false: https://youtu.be/N5ScSc17Iu0   This goes into many different aspects of the Flower of Life: https://youtu.be/FQlFHTZlT5E   It's still true though that there are other ratios besides the Golden Mean Ratio/Fibonacci Spiral.  There is also the Silver Ratio/Silver Spiral: https://youtu.be/oFgUWVsuEaQ https://architects.zone/golden-and-silver-ratio-in-architecture/ "The silver ratio is closely associated with regular octagons. The ratio between the side length and the diagonal of a regular octagon approximates the silver ratio. "While the silver ratio isn't explicitly found in animal anatomy, it can be indirectly observed in patterns or structures that exhibit octagonal symmetry, such as the arrangement of certain shells or the geometry of spider webs. Similarly, the silver ratio may influence the geometry of certain plants, especially those with octagonal or ...

Either Way

I still read her material:  https://justempowerme.com/what-is-the-great-game-of-the-omniverse-who-were-the-players-the-ultimate-end-goal-of-the-game-is-to-eliminate-natural-creation-goal-1-control-the-most-souls-goal-2-control-earth-go/ I read the article from start to finish.  She discusses the same dates Cobra does, but from a very, very different perspective. She updates with articles here: https://justempowerme.com/posts/ Only time will reveal the 'real McCoy.' Either way, it's beneficial to connect to Source with the Flower of Life.  Although  E'Asha Ashayana claims it's harmful, I don't believe so.  The geometry is a circle going through the center of every other circle, which is very balanced. https://www.welovemassmeditation.com/2019/08/daily-flower-of-life-meditation.html

Holding the Light, The Problem I've Run Into, and Aggression May Still Help if Used 'Properly'

Holding the Light To really be stronger with "holding the light," it's not only a matter of having a versatile/adaptive psychology and doing meditations.  The physical body must also be in a balanced state.  Eating meat increases 'barbarian aspects,' which definitely hinders holding the light.  Even after no longer eating meat for a day or two, it's still in the system in the colon.  The cleansing of meat from the system can be sped up through colonic irrigations.  There are ways to do this without going to a colonic irrigation clinic.  I won't go into the details though for the sake of 'etiquette.'   Here are some personal findings.  These findings may or may not apply universally:  – Whey protein isolate or concentrate is destabilizing. (This still isn't certain, but is becoming more and more probable.) – Dairy in its natural forms are not as destabilizing as meat, and can be consumed without being placed too much off balance. – Being lacto...

🔥🔥🔥

Image

Notes Over the Last Week or So

Proposed Protocol for Debates Debate ideas and not people.  If someone tries to turn a debate of an idea into a personal attack, expose what they are doing.  Here’s an example of a hypothetical attack: Person A:  “Some situations can be made out to be more complex than they really are.  It’s healthy to be grounded and down-to-earth at times.” Person B:  "If you were truly enlightened, you wouldn't feel that way.  Maybe you're not as spiritually advanced as you think." Person B is not addressing person A’s argument at all, and is instead using an attack that implies spiritual superiority over person A, while also stating that person A as not spiritually advanced in general, and projecting onto person A that person A believes him/herself to be spiritually advanced, when person A didn’t say anything about being spiritually advanced in the first place. Some attacks can simply be ignored.  Every single thing someone says doesn’t have to be broken down and a...

Green Light

Image
Feels nice.